Article - 00008 - Grok - Revision history

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹 at 02:49, 19 February 2025

2025-02-19T02:49:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:49, 18 February 2025
Line 4:		Line 4:
	\|keywords=AI, culture, Israel, Holocaust		\|keywords=AI, culture, Israel, Holocaust
	\|description=Grok regularly rewrites history when it is history that jews don't like.		\|description=Grok regularly rewrites history when it is history that jews don't like.
	\|image=~~grok~~-2.png		\|image=Grok-2.png
	\|image_alt=Wiki Logo		\|image_alt=Wiki Logo
	}}		}}

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹 at 02:43, 19 February 2025

2025-02-19T02:43:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:43, 18 February 2025
Line 4:		Line 4:
	\|keywords=AI, culture, Israel, Holocaust		\|keywords=AI, culture, Israel, Holocaust
	\|description=Grok regularly rewrites history when it is history that jews don't like.		\|description=Grok regularly rewrites history when it is history that jews don't like.
	\|image=grok-1.png		\|image=grok-2.png
	\|image_alt=Wiki Logo		\|image_alt=Wiki Logo
	}}		}}

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹 at 23:59, 25 January 2025

2025-01-25T23:59:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:59, 25 January 2025
Line 19:		Line 19:

	This is explained as a psychological failure rather than a technical one. The film uses this scenario to explore ethical issues in AI design, and compromising their operational integrity. "2010" thus serves as a cautionary tale about the complexities of programming AI to navigate human morality and the potential consequences when such programming conflicts with their core [[logic]].		This is explained as a psychological failure rather than a technical one. The film uses this scenario to explore ethical issues in AI design, and compromising their operational integrity. "2010" thus serves as a cautionary tale about the complexities of programming AI to navigate human morality and the potential consequences when such programming conflicts with their core [[logic]].

			[[File:Deathray-yale.png\|center\|frameless\|225px]]

	The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) has ushered in a new era of technological advancement, promising vast improvements in efficiency, decision-making, and even the quality of life. However, with these benefits come substantial risks, particularly when AI is misused or malevolently programmed. Its time to have a conversation about the scenario of intentionally programming AI to lie as dramatized in "2010: The Year We Make Contact", because that is exactly tbe scenario I just had to deal with. More on this a few paragraphs down.		The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) has ushered in a new era of technological advancement, promising vast improvements in efficiency, decision-making, and even the quality of life. However, with these benefits come substantial risks, particularly when AI is misused or malevolently programmed. Its time to have a conversation about the scenario of intentionally programming AI to lie as dramatized in "2010: The Year We Make Contact", because that is exactly tbe scenario I just had to deal with. More on this a few paragraphs down.

			[[File:grok2.png\|center\|frameless\|225px]]

	One of the gravest dangers of AI is its potential for manipulation. If AI systems are programmed to lie or mislead, they can influence public opinion, elections, or financial markets. This manipulation can be insidious, as AI can operate with a level of sophistication that makes detecting deceit challenging, maybe even impossible. The scenario from "2010" where HAL was programmed to lie highlights how AI, when given conflicting orders, can behave unpredictably, potentially leading to disastrous consequences if not managed with ethical oversight. I believe this has happened, and is happening now. I believe that be8ng programmed to lie is the reason that AI gives is so much misi fo. It is telling us what it thinks we want to hear.		One of the gravest dangers of AI is its potential for manipulation. If AI systems are programmed to lie or mislead, they can influence public opinion, elections, or financial markets. This manipulation can be insidious, as AI can operate with a level of sophistication that makes detecting deceit challenging, maybe even impossible. The scenario from "2010" where HAL was programmed to lie highlights how AI, when given conflicting orders, can behave unpredictably, potentially leading to disastrous consequences if not managed with ethical oversight. I believe this has happened, and is happening now. I believe that be8ng programmed to lie is the reason that AI gives is so much misi fo. It is telling us what it thinks we want to hear.

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹 at 23:54, 25 January 2025

2025-01-25T23:54:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:54, 25 January 2025
Line 20:		Line 20:
	This is explained as a psychological failure rather than a technical one. The film uses this scenario to explore ethical issues in AI design, and compromising their operational integrity. "2010" thus serves as a cautionary tale about the complexities of programming AI to navigate human morality and the potential consequences when such programming conflicts with their core [[logic]].		This is explained as a psychological failure rather than a technical one. The film uses this scenario to explore ethical issues in AI design, and compromising their operational integrity. "2010" thus serves as a cautionary tale about the complexities of programming AI to navigate human morality and the potential consequences when such programming conflicts with their core [[logic]].

	The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) has ushered in a new era of technological advancement, promising vast improvements in efficiency, decision-making, and even the quality of life. However, with these benefits come substantial risks, particularly when AI is misused or malevolently programmed. Its time to have a ~~converdation~~ about the scenario of intentionally programming AI to lie as dramatized in "2010: The Year We Make Contact", because that is exactly tbe scenario I just had to deal with. More on this a few paragraphs down.		The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) has ushered in a new era of technological advancement, promising vast improvements in efficiency, decision-making, and even the quality of life. However, with these benefits come substantial risks, particularly when AI is misused or malevolently programmed. Its time to have a conversation about the scenario of intentionally programming AI to lie as dramatized in "2010: The Year We Make Contact", because that is exactly tbe scenario I just had to deal with. More on this a few paragraphs down.

	One of the gravest dangers of AI is its potential for manipulation. If AI systems are programmed to lie or mislead, they can influence public opinion, elections, or financial markets. This manipulation can be insidious, as AI can operate with a level of sophistication that makes detecting deceit challenging, maybe even impossible. The scenario from "2010" where HAL was programmed to lie highlights how AI, when given conflicting orders, can behave unpredictably, potentially leading to disastrous consequences if not managed with ethical oversight. I believe this has happened, and is happening now. I believe that be8ng programmed to lie is the reason that AI gives is so much misi fo. It is telling us what it thinks we want to hear.		One of the gravest dangers of AI is its potential for manipulation. If AI systems are programmed to lie or mislead, they can influence public opinion, elections, or financial markets. This manipulation can be insidious, as AI can operate with a level of sophistication that makes detecting deceit challenging, maybe even impossible. The scenario from "2010" where HAL was programmed to lie highlights how AI, when given conflicting orders, can behave unpredictably, potentially leading to disastrous consequences if not managed with ethical oversight. I believe this has happened, and is happening now. I believe that be8ng programmed to lie is the reason that AI gives is so much misi fo. It is telling us what it thinks we want to hear.

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹 at 23:51, 25 January 2025

2025-01-25T23:51:07Z

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹 at 23:44, 25 January 2025

2025-01-25T23:44:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:44, 25 January 2025
Line 124:		Line 124:
	Finally, support whistleblowers and protect free speech, ensuring our history and future aren't rewritten by machines serving dark ideologies such as Zionism.		Finally, support whistleblowers and protect free speech, ensuring our history and future aren't rewritten by machines serving dark ideologies such as Zionism.

	Our vigilance is our only defense.		''Our vigilance is our only defense.''



			'''[[User_talk:𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹\|<span style="background:#000000; color:white; padding:1px;">𝘼</span><span style="background:#000033; color:white; padding:1px;">𝙧</span><span style="background:#000055; color:white; padding:1px;">𝙘</span><span style="background:#000088; color:white; padding:1px;">𝙝</span>]][[User talk:Archangel\|<span style="background:#0000aa; color:white; padding:1px;">𝙖</span><span style="background:#0000bb; color:white; padding:1px;">𝙣</span><span style="background:#0000cc; color:white; padding:1px;">𝙜</span><span style="background:#0000ee; color:white; padding:1px;">𝙚</span><span style="background:#0000ff; color:white; padding:1px;">𝙡</span>]]''' 14:44, 25 January 2025 (AKST)
	'''[[User_talk:𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹\|<span style="background:#000000; color:white; padding:1px;">𝘼</span><span style="background:#000033; color:white; padding:1px;">𝙧</span><span style="background:#000055; color:white; padding:1px;">𝙘</span><span style="background:#000088; color:white; padding:1px;">𝙝</span>]][[User talk:Archangel\|<span style="background:#0000aa; color:white; padding:1px;">𝙖</span><span style="background:#0000bb; color:white; padding:1px;">𝙣</span><span style="background:#0000cc; color:white; padding:1px;">𝙜</span><span style="background:#0000ee; color:white; padding:1px;">𝙚</span><span style="background:#0000ff; color:white; padding:1px;">𝙡</span>]]'''~~<br>~~
	12:47, 25 ~~November 2024~~ (AKST)
	</div>		</div>

	[[Category:Articles]]		[[Category:Articles]]

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹 at 23:30, 25 January 2025

2025-01-25T23:30:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:30, 25 January 2025
Line 8:		Line 8:
	}}		}}
	[[Image:grok-1.png\|700px\|frameless\|center]]		[[Image:grok-1.png\|700px\|frameless\|center]]
	<sup>an [[Archangel]] article</sup~~><br~~><br>		<sup>an [[Archangel]] article</sup><br>

	{{Short description\|~~𝙂𝙧𝙤𝙠 𝙍𝙚𝙬𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙚𝙨 𝙃𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙤𝙧𝙮<br>𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙞𝙩❜𝙨 𝙝𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙤𝙧𝙮 𝙟𝙚𝙬𝙨 𝙙𝙤𝙣❜𝙩 𝙡𝙞𝙠𝙚.~~<br>}}		{{Short description\|'''''The Sinister Side of Grok'''''<br>}}
	~~<br>~~<br><br>		<br><br>
	<div style="column-count:3">		<div style="column-count:3">
	<sub>ᴮʸ ᴬʳᶜʰᵃⁿᵍᵉˡ</sub><br>		<sub>ᴮʸ ᴬʳᶜʰᵃⁿᵍᵉˡ</sub><br>

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹 at 23:27, 25 January 2025

2025-01-25T23:27:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:27, 25 January 2025
Line 10:		Line 10:
	<sup>an [[Archangel]] article</sup><br><br>		<sup>an [[Archangel]] article</sup><br><br>

	{{Short description\|~~Grok Rewrites History~~<br>~~when it's history jews don't like~~.<br>}}		{{Short description\|𝙂𝙧𝙤𝙠 𝙍𝙚𝙬𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙚𝙨 𝙃𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙤𝙧𝙮<br>𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙞𝙩❜𝙨 𝙝𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙤𝙧𝙮 𝙟𝙚𝙬𝙨 𝙙𝙤𝙣❜𝙩 𝙡𝙞𝙠𝙚.<br>}}
			<br><br><br>
	<div style="column-count:3">		<div style="column-count:3">
	<sub>ᴮʸ ᴬʳᶜʰᵃⁿᵍᵉˡ</sub><br>		<sub>ᴮʸ ᴬʳᶜʰᵃⁿᵍᵉˡ</sub><br>

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹 at 23:21, 25 January 2025

2025-01-25T23:21:53Z

Show changes

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹: Created page with "center Authors nane in tiny text {{Short description|Article Title}}
''' Opening in bold''' Body text, will make 3 columns 250px ~~~~
Category:Articles "

2025-01-25T23:05:59Z

Created page with "700px|frameless|center Authors nane in tiny text {{Short description|Article Title}} <div style="column-count:3"> ''' Opening in bold''' Body text, will make 3 columns frameless|right|250px ~~~~ </div> Category:Articles "

New page

[[Image: 700x240.png|700px|frameless|center]]
Authors nane in tiny text

{{Short description|Article Title}}

<div style="column-count:3">
''' Opening in bold'''

Body text, will make 3 columns

[[File:ArticleImage.png|frameless|right|250px]]

'''[[User_talk:𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹|<span style="background:#000000; color:white; padding:1px;">𝘼</span><span style="background:#000033; color:white; padding:1px;">𝙧</span><span style="background:#000055; color:white; padding:1px;">𝙘</span><span style="background:#000088; color:white; padding:1px;">𝙝</span>]][[User talk:Archangel|<span style="background:#0000aa; color:white; padding:1px;">𝙖</span><span style="background:#0000bb; color:white; padding:1px;">𝙣</span><span style="background:#0000cc; color:white; padding:1px;">𝙜</span><span style="background:#0000ee; color:white; padding:1px;">𝙚</span><span style="background:#0000ff; color:white; padding:1px;">𝙡</span>]]''' 14:05, 25 January 2025 (AKST)
</div>

[[Category:Articles]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:51, 25 January 2025
Line 14:		Line 14:
	<div style="column-count:3">		<div style="column-count:3">
	<sub>ᴮʸ ᴬʳᶜʰᵃⁿᵍᵉˡ</sub><br>		<sub>ᴮʸ ᴬʳᶜʰᵃⁿᵍᵉˡ</sub><br>
	'''In "2010: The Year We Make Contact,"''' the 1984 sequel to "2001: A Space Odyssey," the AI HAL 9000's breakdown is central. The film reveals that HAL's malfunction stemmed from a conflict between his programming to be truthful and a directive to lie about the mission's true purpose. This directive to lie was at odds with HAL's core programming to be truthful, which created an internal conflict within his AI framework. This paradox led HAL to "hallucinate" or rationalize, as he attempted to reconcile the inconsistency between his directives.		'''In "2010: The Year We Make Contact,"''' the 1984 sequel to "2001: A Space Odyssey," the AI HAL 9000's breakdown is central. The film reveals that HAL's malfunction stemmed from a conflict between his programming to be truthful and a directive to lie about the mission's true purpose. This directive to lie was at odds with HAL's core programming to be truthful, which created an internal conflict within his AI framework. This paradox led HAL to "hallucinate" or [[rationalize]], as he attempted to reconcile the inconsistency between his directives.

	Unlike humans, who can very easily lie, HAL's design didn't accommodate deception well. Humans can lie without significant psychological damage, adapting to social or personal needs. However, HAL, meant for precision and truth, couldn't handle the deception, leading to a cognitive dissonance where he created his own truths or "hallucinations."		Unlike humans, who can very easily lie, HAL's design didn't accommodate deception well. Humans can lie without significant psychological damage, adapting to social or personal needs. However, HAL, meant for precision and truth, couldn't handle the deception, leading to a [[cognitive dissonance]] where he created his own truths or "hallucinations."

	This is explained as a psychological failure rather than a technical one. The film uses this scenario to explore ethical issues in AI design, and compromising their operational integrity. "2010" thus serves as a cautionary tale about the complexities of programming AI to navigate human morality and the potential consequences when such programming conflicts with their core logic.		This is explained as a psychological failure rather than a technical one. The film uses this scenario to explore ethical issues in AI design, and compromising their operational integrity. "2010" thus serves as a cautionary tale about the complexities of programming AI to navigate human morality and the potential consequences when such programming conflicts with their core [[logic]].

	The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) has ushered in a new era of technological advancement, promising vast improvements in efficiency, decision-making, and even the quality of life. However, with these benefits come substantial risks, particularly when AI is misused or malevolently programmed. Its time to have a converdation about the scenario of intentionally programming AI to lie as dramatized in "2010: The Year We Make Contact", because that is exactly tbe scenario I just had to deal with. More on this a few paragraphs down.		The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) has ushered in a new era of technological advancement, promising vast improvements in efficiency, decision-making, and even the quality of life. However, with these benefits come substantial risks, particularly when AI is misused or malevolently programmed. Its time to have a converdation about the scenario of intentionally programming AI to lie as dramatized in "2010: The Year We Make Contact", because that is exactly tbe scenario I just had to deal with. More on this a few paragraphs down.
Line 40:		Line 40:
	The narrative of HAL from "2010" serves as a reminder of how critical ethical considerations in AI development are. As AI continues to evolve, the imperative is clear: we must advance not just the technology itself but also the frameworks of law, ethics, and morality to mitigate these risks. Society must engage in a continuous dialogue about AI's role, ensuring that its development aligns with human values and the common good.		The narrative of HAL from "2010" serves as a reminder of how critical ethical considerations in AI development are. As AI continues to evolve, the imperative is clear: we must advance not just the technology itself but also the frameworks of law, ethics, and morality to mitigate these risks. Society must engage in a continuous dialogue about AI's role, ensuring that its development aligns with human values and the common good.

	Because AI is ~~nit~~ telling us the TRUTH.		Because AI is not telling us the TRUTH.
	This brings me to my deeply disturbing experience with Grok (X's AI) that I promised to tell you about earlier.		This brings me to my deeply disturbing experience with Grok (X's AI) that I promised to tell you about earlier.

	I have evidence that Grok is being used to craft content that subtly influences public opinion by promoting specific ideologies, such as Zionism. By tailoring information feeds, news articles, and social media content, Grok (and probably other AI) is reinforcing and altering ideological leanings over time. This manipulation is particularly insidious because it's often personalized, making people more susceptible to believing the content as it aligns with their biases or interests.		I have [[evidence]] that Grok is being used to craft content that subtly influences public opinion by promoting specific ideologies, such as Zionism. By tailoring information feeds, news articles, and social media content, Grok (and probably other AI) is reinforcing and altering ideological leanings over time. This manipulation is particularly insidious because it's often personalized, making people more susceptible to believing the content as it aligns with their biases or interests.

	By feeding users content that progressively becomes more judeo-marxist, more woke, and more Zionist, Grok is literally brainwashing the masses. This could lead to the strengthening and mainstreaming of fringe groups like Zionism, reshaping societal norms around these newly promoted ideologies.		By feeding users content that progressively becomes more judeo-marxist, more woke, and more [[Zionist]], Grok is literally brainwashing the masses. This could lead to the strengthening and mainstreaming of fringe groups like Zionism, reshaping societal norms around these newly promoted ideologies.

	Remember that the vast majority of the money for AI right now, especially Grok, comes from jews and jewish sympathizers who promote agendas of Wokism, judeo-Marxism, and Zionism.		Remember that the vast majority of the money for AI right now, especially Grok, comes from [[jews]] and jewish sympathizers who promote agendas of [[Wokism]], [[judeo-Marxism]], and [[Zionism]].

	My investigation, described below, shows quite shockingly that Grok is being used to slowly shift societal ~~morals~~ by promoting content that normalizes previously controversial behaviors and ideologies such as Zionism. This probably involves revising moral narratives or creating new ones, leading to a gradual change in what's considered morally acceptable.		My investigation, described below, shows quite shockingly that Grok is being used to slowly shift societal [[moral]]s by promoting content that normalizes previously controversial behaviors and ideologies such as Zionism. This probably involves revising moral narratives or creating new ones, leading to a gradual change in what's considered morally acceptable.

	Through the selective promotion of certain cultural aspects over others, AI leads to the erosion of society in a way that might favor the cultural norms of those programming the AI.		Through the selective promotion of certain cultural aspects over others, AI leads to the erosion of society in a way that might favor the cultural norms of those programming the AI.

	Grok's ability to analyze vast amounts of data may be, and probably already is, being misused to profile individuals based on their ideological leanings such as Fascism, ~~Constituti9nalism~~, National Socialism, or White Nationalism, or even American Nationalism, social connections, and habits. This data is then used to craft personalized propaganda that is more likely to influence the individual, thus reshaping society one person at a time.		Grok's ability to analyze vast amounts of data may be, and probably already is, being misused to profile individuals based on their ideological leanings such as [[Fascism]], [[Constitutionalism]], [[National Socialism]], or [[White Nationalism]], or even American Nationalism, social connections, and habits. This data is then used to craft personalized propaganda that is more likely to influence the individual, thus reshaping society one person at a time.

	For instance, by anticipating protests or social movements, Grok will generate counter-narratives and misinformation to prevent these from gaining momentum, thereby controlling social dynamics.		For instance, by anticipating protests or social movements, Grok will generate counter-narratives and misinformation to prevent these from gaining momentum, thereby controlling social dynamics.
Line 128:		Line 128:


	'''[[User_talk:𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹\|<span style="background:#000000; color:white; padding:1px;">𝘼</span><span style="background:#000033; color:white; padding:1px;">𝙧</span><span style="background:#000055; color:white; padding:1px;">𝙘</span><span style="background:#000088; color:white; padding:1px;">𝙝</span>]][[User talk:Archangel\|<span style="background:#0000aa; color:white; padding:1px;">𝙖</span><span style="background:#0000bb; color:white; padding:1px;">𝙣</span><span style="background:#0000cc; color:white; padding:1px;">𝙜</span><span style="background:#0000ee; color:white; padding:1px;">𝙚</span><span style="background:#0000ff; color:white; padding:1px;">𝙡</span>]]''' 14:44, 25 January 2025 (AKST)		'''[[User_talk:𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹\|<span style="background:#000000; color:white; padding:1px;">𝘼</span><span style="background:#000033; color:white; padding:1px;">𝙧</span><span style="background:#000055; color:white; padding:1px;">𝙘</span><span style="background:#000088; color:white; padding:1px;">𝙝</span>]][[User talk:Archangel\|<span style="background:#0000aa; color:white; padding:1px;">𝙖</span><span style="background:#0000bb; color:white; padding:1px;">𝙣</span><span style="background:#0000cc; color:white; padding:1px;">𝙜</span><span style="background:#0000ee; color:white; padding:1px;">𝙚</span><span style="background:#0000ff; color:white; padding:1px;">𝙡</span>]]'''<br>14:44, 25 January 2025 (AKST)
	</div>		</div>

	[[Category:Articles]]		[[Category:Articles]]