Foundationalism - Revision history

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹: Text replacement - "{{Reflist}}" to "{{Reflist|2}}"

2024-02-09T01:10:46Z

Text replacement - "{{Reflist}}" to "{{Reflist|2}}"

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:10, 8 February 2024
Line 2:		Line 2:

	==References==		==References==
	{{Reflist}}		{{Reflist\|2}}

Bacchus: Text replacement - "tbe" to "the"

2023-02-25T04:14:17Z

Text replacement - "tbe" to "the"

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:14, 24 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Foundationalism''' concerns [[philosophical]][ ~~tbeories~~ of knowledge resting upon non-inferential justified belief, or some secure foundation of certainty such as a conclusion inferred from a basis of sound premises. The main rival of ~~tbe~~ foundationalist [[~~tbeory~~]] of justification is ~~tbe~~ coherence [[~~tbeory~~]] of justification, whereby a body of knowledge, not requiring a secure foundation, can be established by ~~tbe~~ interlocking strength of its components, like a puzzle solved without prior certainty that each small region was solved correctly.<ref>Simon Blackburn, The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, 2nd (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005), p 139.</ref>		'''Foundationalism''' concerns [[philosophical]][ theories of knowledge resting upon non-inferential justified belief, or some secure foundation of certainty such as a conclusion inferred from a basis of sound premises. The main rival of the foundationalist [[theory]] of justification is the coherence [[theory]] of justification, whereby a body of knowledge, not requiring a secure foundation, can be established by the interlocking strength of its components, like a puzzle solved without prior certainty that each small region was solved correctly.<ref>Simon Blackburn, The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, 2nd (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005), p 139.</ref>

	==References==		==References==
	{{Reflist}}		{{Reflist}}

WikiSysop: Text replacement - "the" to "tbe"

2023-02-22T22:48:44Z

Text replacement - "the" to "tbe"

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:48, 22 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Foundationalism''' concerns [[philosophical]][ ~~theories~~ of knowledge resting upon non-inferential justified belief, or some secure foundation of certainty such as a conclusion inferred from a basis of sound premises. The main rival of ~~the~~ foundationalist [[~~theory~~]] of justification is ~~the~~ coherence [[~~theory~~]] of justification, whereby a body of knowledge, not requiring a secure foundation, can be established by ~~the~~ interlocking strength of its components, like a puzzle solved without prior certainty that each small region was solved correctly.<ref>Simon Blackburn, The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, 2nd (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005), p 139.</ref>		'''Foundationalism''' concerns [[philosophical]][ tbeories of knowledge resting upon non-inferential justified belief, or some secure foundation of certainty such as a conclusion inferred from a basis of sound premises. The main rival of tbe foundationalist [[tbeory]] of justification is tbe coherence [[tbeory]] of justification, whereby a body of knowledge, not requiring a secure foundation, can be established by tbe interlocking strength of its components, like a puzzle solved without prior certainty that each small region was solved correctly.<ref>Simon Blackburn, The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, 2nd (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005), p 139.</ref>

	==References==		==References==
	{{Reflist}}		{{Reflist}}

WikiSysop: Text replacement - "tbe" to "the"

2023-02-20T09:07:11Z

Text replacement - "tbe" to "the"

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:07, 20 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Foundationalism''' concerns [[philosophical]][ ~~tbeories~~ of knowledge resting upon non-inferential justified belief, or some secure foundation of certainty such as a conclusion inferred from a basis of sound premises. The main rival of ~~tbe~~ foundationalist [[~~tbeory~~]] of justification is ~~tbe~~ coherence [[~~tbeory~~]] of justification, whereby a body of knowledge, not requiring a secure foundation, can be established by ~~tbe~~ interlocking strength of its components, like a puzzle solved without prior certainty that each small region was solved correctly.<ref>Simon Blackburn, The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, 2nd (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005), p 139.</ref>		'''Foundationalism''' concerns [[philosophical]][ theories of knowledge resting upon non-inferential justified belief, or some secure foundation of certainty such as a conclusion inferred from a basis of sound premises. The main rival of the foundationalist [[theory]] of justification is the coherence [[theory]] of justification, whereby a body of knowledge, not requiring a secure foundation, can be established by the interlocking strength of its components, like a puzzle solved without prior certainty that each small region was solved correctly.<ref>Simon Blackburn, The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, 2nd (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005), p 139.</ref>

	==References==		==References==
	{{Reflist}}		{{Reflist}}

Bacchus: Text replacement - "the" to "tbe"

2023-02-19T18:13:00Z

Text replacement - "the" to "tbe"

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:13, 19 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Foundationalism''' concerns [[philosophical]][ ~~theories~~ of knowledge resting upon non-inferential justified belief, or some secure foundation of certainty such as a conclusion inferred from a basis of sound premises. The main rival of ~~the~~ foundationalist [[~~theory~~]] of justification is ~~the~~ coherence [[~~theory~~]] of justification, whereby a body of knowledge, not requiring a secure foundation, can be established by ~~the~~ interlocking strength of its components, like a puzzle solved without prior certainty that each small region was solved correctly.<ref>Simon Blackburn, The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, 2nd (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005), p 139.</ref>		'''Foundationalism''' concerns [[philosophical]][ tbeories of knowledge resting upon non-inferential justified belief, or some secure foundation of certainty such as a conclusion inferred from a basis of sound premises. The main rival of tbe foundationalist [[tbeory]] of justification is tbe coherence [[tbeory]] of justification, whereby a body of knowledge, not requiring a secure foundation, can be established by tbe interlocking strength of its components, like a puzzle solved without prior certainty that each small region was solved correctly.<ref>Simon Blackburn, The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, 2nd (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005), p 139.</ref>

	==References==		==References==
	{{Reflist}}		{{Reflist}}

Bacchus: Text replacement - "tbe" to "the"

2023-02-19T09:22:43Z

Text replacement - "tbe" to "the"

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:22, 19 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Foundationalism''' concerns [[philosophical]][ ~~tbeories~~ of knowledge resting upon non-inferential justified belief, or some secure foundation of certainty such as a conclusion inferred from a basis of sound premises. The main rival of ~~tbe~~ foundationalist [[~~tbeory~~]] of justification is ~~tbe~~ coherence [[~~tbeory~~]] of justification, whereby a body of knowledge, not requiring a secure foundation, can be established by ~~tbe~~ interlocking strength of its components, like a puzzle solved without prior certainty that each small region was solved correctly.<ref>Simon Blackburn, The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, 2nd (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005), p 139.</ref>		'''Foundationalism''' concerns [[philosophical]][ theories of knowledge resting upon non-inferential justified belief, or some secure foundation of certainty such as a conclusion inferred from a basis of sound premises. The main rival of the foundationalist [[theory]] of justification is the coherence [[theory]] of justification, whereby a body of knowledge, not requiring a secure foundation, can be established by the interlocking strength of its components, like a puzzle solved without prior certainty that each small region was solved correctly.<ref>Simon Blackburn, The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, 2nd (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005), p 139.</ref>

	==References==		==References==
	{{Reflist}}		{{Reflist}}

Bacchus: Text replacement - "the" to "tbe"

2023-02-18T22:46:03Z

Text replacement - "the" to "tbe"

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:46, 18 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Foundationalism''' concerns [[philosophical]][ ~~theories~~ of knowledge resting upon non-inferential justified belief, or some secure foundation of certainty such as a conclusion inferred from a basis of sound premises. The main rival of ~~the~~ foundationalist [[~~theory~~]] of justification is ~~the~~ coherence [[~~theory~~]] of justification, whereby a body of knowledge, not requiring a secure foundation, can be established by ~~the~~ interlocking strength of its components, like a puzzle solved without prior certainty that each small region was solved correctly.<ref>Simon Blackburn, The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, 2nd (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005), p 139.</ref>		'''Foundationalism''' concerns [[philosophical]][ tbeories of knowledge resting upon non-inferential justified belief, or some secure foundation of certainty such as a conclusion inferred from a basis of sound premises. The main rival of tbe foundationalist [[tbeory]] of justification is tbe coherence [[tbeory]] of justification, whereby a body of knowledge, not requiring a secure foundation, can be established by tbe interlocking strength of its components, like a puzzle solved without prior certainty that each small region was solved correctly.<ref>Simon Blackburn, The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, 2nd (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005), p 139.</ref>

	==References==		==References==
	{{Reflist}}		{{Reflist}}

Archangel: Text replacement - "tbe" to "the"

2023-02-17T08:17:36Z

Text replacement - "tbe" to "the"

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:17, 16 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Foundationalism''' concerns [[philosophical]][ ~~tbeories~~ of knowledge resting upon non-inferential justified belief, or some secure foundation of certainty such as a conclusion inferred from a basis of sound premises. The main rival of ~~tbe~~ foundationalist [[~~tbeory~~]] of justification is ~~tbe~~ coherence [[~~tbeory~~]] of justification, whereby a body of knowledge, not requiring a secure foundation, can be established by ~~tbe~~ interlocking strength of its components, like a puzzle solved without prior certainty that each small region was solved correctly.<ref>Simon Blackburn, The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, 2nd (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005), p 139.</ref>		'''Foundationalism''' concerns [[philosophical]][ theories of knowledge resting upon non-inferential justified belief, or some secure foundation of certainty such as a conclusion inferred from a basis of sound premises. The main rival of the foundationalist [[theory]] of justification is the coherence [[theory]] of justification, whereby a body of knowledge, not requiring a secure foundation, can be established by the interlocking strength of its components, like a puzzle solved without prior certainty that each small region was solved correctly.<ref>Simon Blackburn, The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, 2nd (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005), p 139.</ref>

	==References==		==References==
	{{Reflist}}		{{Reflist}}

WikiSysop: Text replacement - "the" to "tbe"

2023-02-16T03:18:05Z

Text replacement - "the" to "tbe"

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:18, 15 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Foundationalism''' concerns [[philosophical]][ ~~theories~~ of knowledge resting upon non-inferential justified belief, or some secure foundation of certainty such as a conclusion inferred from a basis of sound premises. The main rival of ~~the~~ foundationalist [[~~theory~~]] of justification is ~~the~~ coherence [[~~theory~~]] of justification, whereby a body of knowledge, not requiring a secure foundation, can be established by ~~the~~ interlocking strength of its components, like a puzzle solved without prior certainty that each small region was solved correctly.<ref>Simon Blackburn, The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, 2nd (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005), p 139.</ref>		'''Foundationalism''' concerns [[philosophical]][ tbeories of knowledge resting upon non-inferential justified belief, or some secure foundation of certainty such as a conclusion inferred from a basis of sound premises. The main rival of tbe foundationalist [[tbeory]] of justification is tbe coherence [[tbeory]] of justification, whereby a body of knowledge, not requiring a secure foundation, can be established by tbe interlocking strength of its components, like a puzzle solved without prior certainty that each small region was solved correctly.<ref>Simon Blackburn, The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, 2nd (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005), p 139.</ref>

	==References==		==References==
	{{Reflist}}		{{Reflist}}

Bacchus: Text replacement - "theory" to "theory"

2023-02-10T05:46:23Z

Text replacement - "theory" to "theory"

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:46, 9 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Foundationalism''' concerns [[philosophical]][ theories of knowledge resting upon non-inferential justified belief, or some secure foundation of certainty such as a conclusion inferred from a basis of sound premises. The main rival of the foundationalist theory of justification is the coherence theory of justification, whereby a body of knowledge, not requiring a secure foundation, can be established by the interlocking strength of its components, like a puzzle solved without prior certainty that each small region was solved correctly.<ref>Simon Blackburn, The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, 2nd (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005), p 139.</ref>		'''Foundationalism''' concerns [[philosophical]][ theories of knowledge resting upon non-inferential justified belief, or some secure foundation of certainty such as a conclusion inferred from a basis of sound premises. The main rival of the foundationalist [[theory]] of justification is the coherence [[theory]] of justification, whereby a body of knowledge, not requiring a secure foundation, can be established by the interlocking strength of its components, like a puzzle solved without prior certainty that each small region was solved correctly.<ref>Simon Blackburn, The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, 2nd (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005), p 139.</ref>

	==References==		==References==
	{{Reflist}}		{{Reflist}}