Protectionism - Revision history

Rightof Genghiskhan at 05:11, 8 April 2023

2023-04-08T05:11:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:11, 7 April 2023
Line 5:		Line 5:

	== Within Economics ==		== Within Economics ==
	Protectionism is a position partially opposed to Free Market [[Capitalism]]. It supports a limited intervention in the economy by the State - being thus opposed to the "Free Market" aspect - whilst still ~~mantaining~~ private property and trade - remaining Capitalism.		Protectionism is a position partially opposed to Free Market [[Capitalism]]. It supports a limited intervention in the economy by the State - being thus opposed to the "Free Market" aspect - whilst still maintaining private property and trade - remaining Capitalism.

	Generally, marxist economics adopt positions which could be considered "protectionist" whilst however not adhering to Protectionism ''per sé''.		Generally, marxist economics adopt positions which could be considered "protectionist" whilst however not adhering to Protectionism ''per sé''.

Deleted User at 20:32, 24 December 2022

2022-12-24T20:32:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:32, 24 December 2022
Line 18:		Line 18:
	In the United States, however, where the "Right" can be considered largely synonymous with Neo-Conservatism and Liberalism, it's still an unpopular policy, with notable exceptions such as Donald Trump.		In the United States, however, where the "Right" can be considered largely synonymous with Neo-Conservatism and Liberalism, it's still an unpopular policy, with notable exceptions such as Donald Trump.
	<references />		<references />
	[[Category:~~Economics~~]]
			[[Category:Philosophy]]

Bacchus: Text replacement - "{{Citation needed}}" to ""

2022-11-29T23:59:37Z

Text replacement - "{{Citation needed}}" to ""

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:59, 29 November 2022
Line 9:		Line 9:
	Generally, marxist economics adopt positions which could be considered "protectionist" whilst however not adhering to Protectionism ''per sé''.		Generally, marxist economics adopt positions which could be considered "protectionist" whilst however not adhering to Protectionism ''per sé''.

	The extent to which protectionism can be enacted are still debated; most economists consider it a temporary measure akin to austerity which is unsustainable over the long term, only partly because of economic reasons<ref>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352550922000094</ref>.~~{{Citation needed}}~~		The extent to which protectionism can be enacted are still debated; most economists consider it a temporary measure akin to austerity which is unsustainable over the long term, only partly because of economic reasons<ref>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352550922000094</ref>.

	It's also up to debate whether protectionism is beneficial to the economy: Austrian School and Chicago School economists (and similar, such as those aligned with Mises) believe that it causes more harm than good; Keynesians, instead, believe the opposite. It has also at time been endorsed by proponents of the Green New Deal and the New Deal itself.~~{{Citation needed}}~~		It's also up to debate whether protectionism is beneficial to the economy: Austrian School and Chicago School economists (and similar, such as those aligned with Mises) believe that it causes more harm than good; Keynesians, instead, believe the opposite. It has also at time been endorsed by proponents of the Green New Deal and the New Deal itself.

	== Within Politics ==		== Within Politics ==

Bacchus: /* Within Politics */

2022-10-11T19:57:04Z

Within Politics

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:57, 11 October 2022
Line 18:		Line 18:
	In the United States, however, where the "Right" can be considered largely synonymous with Neo-Conservatism and Liberalism, it's still an unpopular policy, with notable exceptions such as Donald Trump.		In the United States, however, where the "Right" can be considered largely synonymous with Neo-Conservatism and Liberalism, it's still an unpopular policy, with notable exceptions such as Donald Trump.
	<references />		<references />
	~~[[Category:Definitions]]~~[[Category:Economics]]		[[Category:Economics]]

Bacchus: /* Within Economics */

2022-10-11T19:56:18Z

Within Economics

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:56, 11 October 2022
Line 5:		Line 5:

	== Within Economics ==		== Within Economics ==
	Protectionism is a position partially opposed to Free Market Capitalism. It supports a limited intervention in the economy by the State - being thus opposed to the "Free Market" aspect - whilst still mantaining private property and trade - remaining Capitalism.		Protectionism is a position partially opposed to Free Market [[Capitalism]]. It supports a limited intervention in the economy by the State - being thus opposed to the "Free Market" aspect - whilst still mantaining private property and trade - remaining Capitalism.

	Generally, marxist economics adopt positions which could be considered "protectionist" whilst however not adhering to Protectionism ''per sé''.		Generally, marxist economics adopt positions which could be considered "protectionist" whilst however not adhering to Protectionism ''per sé''.

MilleBracciaAlzate at 10:47, 4 September 2022

2022-09-04T10:47:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:47, 4 September 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Nopic}}
			{{Cleanup}}
			{{Stub}}
	'''Protectionism''' refers to government policies that restrict international trade to help domestic industries. Protectionist policies are usually implemented with the goal to improve economic activity within a domestic economy but can also be implemented for safety or quality concerns.		'''Protectionism''' refers to government policies that restrict international trade to help domestic industries. Protectionist policies are usually implemented with the goal to improve economic activity within a domestic economy but can also be implemented for safety or quality concerns.

Line 6:		Line 9:
	Generally, marxist economics adopt positions which could be considered "protectionist" whilst however not adhering to Protectionism ''per sé''.		Generally, marxist economics adopt positions which could be considered "protectionist" whilst however not adhering to Protectionism ''per sé''.

	The extent to which protectionism can be enacted are still debated; most economists consider it a temporary measure akin to austerity which is unsustainable over the long term, only partly because of economic reasons<ref>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352550922000094</ref>.		The extent to which protectionism can be enacted are still debated; most economists consider it a temporary measure akin to austerity which is unsustainable over the long term, only partly because of economic reasons<ref>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352550922000094</ref>.{{Citation needed}}

	It's also up to debate whether protectionism is beneficial to the economy: Austrian School and Chicago School economists (and similar, such as those aligned with Mises) believe that it causes more harm than good; Keynesians, instead, believe the opposite. It has also at time been endorsed by proponents of the Green New Deal and the New Deal itself.		It's also up to debate whether protectionism is beneficial to the economy: Austrian School and Chicago School economists (and similar, such as those aligned with Mises) believe that it causes more harm than good; Keynesians, instead, believe the opposite. It has also at time been endorsed by proponents of the Green New Deal and the New Deal itself.{{Citation needed}}

	== Within Politics ==		== Within Politics ==
Line 15:		Line 18:
	In the United States, however, where the "Right" can be considered largely synonymous with Neo-Conservatism and Liberalism, it's still an unpopular policy, with notable exceptions such as Donald Trump.		In the United States, however, where the "Right" can be considered largely synonymous with Neo-Conservatism and Liberalism, it's still an unpopular policy, with notable exceptions such as Donald Trump.
	<references />		<references />
	[[Category:Definitions]]		[[Category:Definitions]][[Category:Economics]]

MilleBracciaAlzate: Article needs more

2022-09-04T10:44:53Z

Article needs more

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:44, 4 September 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Protectionism''' refers to government policies that restrict international trade to help domestic industries. Protectionist policies are usually implemented with the goal to improve economic activity within a domestic economy but can also be implemented for safety or quality concerns.		'''Protectionism''' refers to government policies that restrict international trade to help domestic industries. Protectionist policies are usually implemented with the goal to improve economic activity within a domestic economy but can also be implemented for safety or quality concerns.

			== Within Economics ==
			Protectionism is a position partially opposed to Free Market Capitalism. It supports a limited intervention in the economy by the State - being thus opposed to the "Free Market" aspect - whilst still mantaining private property and trade - remaining Capitalism.

			Generally, marxist economics adopt positions which could be considered "protectionist" whilst however not adhering to Protectionism ''per sé''.

			The extent to which protectionism can be enacted are still debated; most economists consider it a temporary measure akin to austerity which is unsustainable over the long term, only partly because of economic reasons<ref>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352550922000094</ref>.

			It's also up to debate whether protectionism is beneficial to the economy: Austrian School and Chicago School economists (and similar, such as those aligned with Mises) believe that it causes more harm than good; Keynesians, instead, believe the opposite. It has also at time been endorsed by proponents of the Green New Deal and the New Deal itself.

			== Within Politics ==
			The position of protectionism is mostly promoted by Populists, particularly on the right (though the "Old Left", contrary to the newer "Progressive Left", also advocated it).

			In the United States, however, where the "Right" can be considered largely synonymous with Neo-Conservatism and Liberalism, it's still an unpopular policy, with notable exceptions such as Donald Trump.
			<references />
	[[Category:Definitions]]		[[Category:Definitions]]

Deleted User: Created page with "'''Protectionism''' refers to government policies that restrict international trade to help domestic industries. Protectionist policies are usually implemented with the goal to improve economic activity within a domestic economy but can also be implemented for safety or quality concerns. Category:Definitions"

2022-07-04T06:49:37Z

Created page with "'''Protectionism''' refers to government policies that restrict international trade to help domestic industries. Protectionist policies are usually implemented with the goal to improve economic activity within a domestic economy but can also be implemented for safety or quality concerns. Category:Definitions"

New page

'''Protectionism''' refers to government policies that restrict international trade to help domestic industries. Protectionist policies are usually implemented with the goal to improve economic activity within a domestic economy but can also be implemented for safety or quality concerns.

[[Category:Definitions]]