Relevant logic - Revision history

Bacchus: Text replacement - " They" to " they"

2023-02-16T10:17:07Z

Text replacement - " They" to " they"

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:17, 16 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Relevant logic''', also called relevant logic, is a kind of non-classical logic requiring the antecedent and consequent of implications to be relevantly related. ~~They~~ may be viewed as a family of substructural or modal logics. It is generally, but not universally, called relevant logic by British and, especially, Australian logicians, and relevance logic by American logicians. Relevance logic aims to capture aspects of implication that are ignored by the "material implication" operator in classical truth-[[functional logic]], namely the notion of relevance between antecedent and conditional of a true implication. This idea is not new: C. I. Lewis was led to invent [[modal logic]], and specifically strict implication, on the grounds that classical logic grants paradoxes of material implication such as the principle that a falsehood implies any proposition.		'''Relevant logic''', also called relevant logic, is a kind of non-classical logic requiring the antecedent and consequent of implications to be relevantly related. they may be viewed as a family of substructural or modal logics. It is generally, but not universally, called relevant logic by British and, especially, Australian logicians, and relevance logic by American logicians. Relevance logic aims to capture aspects of implication that are ignored by the "material implication" operator in classical truth-[[functional logic]], namely the notion of relevance between antecedent and conditional of a true implication. This idea is not new: C. I. Lewis was led to invent [[modal logic]], and specifically strict implication, on the grounds that classical logic grants paradoxes of material implication such as the principle that a falsehood implies any proposition.

	[[Category:Definitions]]		[[Category:Definitions]]

Deleted User at 21:24, 20 January 2023

2023-01-20T21:24:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:24, 20 January 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~[[Relevance~~ logic]], also called relevant logic, is a kind of non-classical logic requiring the antecedent and consequent of implications to be relevantly related. They may be viewed as a family of substructural or modal logics. It is generally, but not universally, called relevant logic by British and, especially, Australian logicians, and relevance logic by American logicians. Relevance logic aims to capture aspects of implication that are ignored by the "material implication" operator in classical truth-[[functional logic]], namely the notion of relevance between antecedent and conditional of a true implication. This idea is not new: C. I. Lewis was led to invent [[modal logic]], and specifically strict implication, on the grounds that classical logic grants paradoxes of material implication such as the principle that a falsehood implies any proposition.		'''Relevant logic''', also called relevant logic, is a kind of non-classical logic requiring the antecedent and consequent of implications to be relevantly related. They may be viewed as a family of substructural or modal logics. It is generally, but not universally, called relevant logic by British and, especially, Australian logicians, and relevance logic by American logicians. Relevance logic aims to capture aspects of implication that are ignored by the "material implication" operator in classical truth-[[functional logic]], namely the notion of relevance between antecedent and conditional of a true implication. This idea is not new: C. I. Lewis was led to invent [[modal logic]], and specifically strict implication, on the grounds that classical logic grants paradoxes of material implication such as the principle that a falsehood implies any proposition.

	[[Category:Definitions]]		[[Category:Definitions]]

Bacchus: Created page with "Relevance logic, also called relevant logic, is a kind of non-classical logic requiring the antecedent and consequent of implications to be relevantly related. They may be viewed as a family of substructural or modal logics. It is generally, but not universally, called relevant logic by British and, especially, Australian logicians, and relevance logic by American logicians. Relevance logic aims to capture aspects of implication that are ignored by the "material impl..."

2023-01-20T20:58:51Z

Created page with "Relevance logic, also called relevant logic, is a kind of non-classical logic requiring the antecedent and consequent of implications to be relevantly related. They may be viewed as a family of substructural or modal logics. It is generally, but not universally, called relevant logic by British and, especially, Australian logicians, and relevance logic by American logicians. Relevance logic aims to capture aspects of implication that are ignored by the "material impl..."

New page

[[Relevance logic]], also called relevant logic, is a kind of non-classical logic requiring the antecedent and consequent of implications to be relevantly related. They may be viewed as a family of substructural or modal logics. It is generally, but not universally, called relevant logic by British and, especially, Australian logicians, and relevance logic by American logicians. Relevance logic aims to capture aspects of implication that are ignored by the "material implication" operator in classical truth-[[functional logic]], namely the notion of relevance between antecedent and conditional of a true implication. This idea is not new: C. I. Lewis was led to invent [[modal logic]], and specifically strict implication, on the grounds that classical logic grants paradoxes of material implication such as the principle that a falsehood implies any proposition.

[[Category:Definitions]]