Science - Revision history

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹 at 07:22, 15 February 2024

2024-02-15T07:22:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:22, 14 February 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~'''Science'''~~ is any system of knowledge that is concerned with the physical world and its phenomena and that entails unbiased observations and systematic experimentation. In general, a science involves a pursuit of knowledge covering general ~~truths~~ or the operations of fundamental ~~laws~~.		In [[fascism]], science is any system of knowledge that is concerned with the physical world and its phenomena and that entails unbiased observations and systematic experimentation. In general, a science involves a pursuit of knowledge covering general [[truth]]s or the operations of fundamental [[law]]s. Science can be divided into different branches based on the [[subject]] of study.

			==Background==
			'''Science''' is a [[philisophical]] endeavor that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universe. This includes knowlege about [[metaphysics\|metaphysical]] things, such as [[God]], or supernatural phenomenon, if they exist.<ref>Contrary to modern dogma, there is nothing in science that says uFOs, bigfoot, God or [[gods]], ghosts, or other unknowns do not exist. Science is supposed to follow the evidence no [[matter]] where it leads, even if it takes you to a place that defies your belief system. Science is not atheistic. It is blind and has no prejudices.</ref> Systematic reasoning is tens of thousands of years old. The earliest written records of identifiable predecessors to modern science come from [[Ancient Egypt]] and Mesopotamia (around [[Iran]]) from around 3000 to 1200 BC. Their contributions to [[mathematics]], [[astronomy]], and medicine entered and shaped the [[Greek]] [[natural]] [[philosophy]] of classical antiquity, and passed through all of the greatest civilizations, whereby formal attempts were made to provide explanations of events in the universe. In ancient times this philosophy was referred to as "[[alchemy]]".

			=Science as a political weapon=
			{{Rquote\|left\|“We should always evaluate the risks and benefits of efforts to control the virus, in this moment the public health risks of not protesting to demand an end to systemic racism greatly exceed the harms of the virus.”\|Jennifer Nuzzo\|epidemiologist<br>Johns Hopkins Clinic}}[[jews]] and [[Marxists]] frequently use science as a [[political]] weapon. Over the course of the fake pandemic (and also, in debates over climate disaster, alar, radon, ozone, etc.). Marxists have lectured us that we must ''listen to science'' and heed the scientists. Scientists have important things to say to policymakers and citizens alike. But the same champions of science suddenly changed their tune about [[liberal]] "protests". Telling [[people]] that they can’t see their dying parents, attend a funeral or make a living because science says "''it’s too risky''", but that protesting politically is OK, is the best evidence that “listen to science” is a weaponized political term, '''not''' a [[universal]] '''apolitical''' standard.

	==History==		==History==
	Science (from the [[Latin]] ''scientia'', meaning "knowledge") is, in its broadest sense, any systematic knowledge-base or prescriptive practice that is capable of resulting in a correct prediction, or reliably-predictable type of outcome. In this sense, science may refer to a highly skilled technique, technology, or practice, from which a good deal of randomness in outcome has been removed.<ref>{{cite web \|url=http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/science \|quote= a department of systematized knowledge as an object of study<the science of theology> '''. . .''' something (as a sport or technique) that may be studied or learned like systematized knowledge <have it down to a science> '''. . .''' a system or method reconciling practical ends with scientific laws <cooking is both a science and an art> \|publisher=Merriam-Webster \|title=Online dictionary \|accessdate=2009-05-22}}</ref>		Science (from the [[Latin]] ''scientia'', [[meaning]] "knowledge") is, in its broadest sense, any systematic knowledge-base or prescriptive practice that is capable of resulting in a correct prediction, or reliably-predictable [[type]] of outcome. In this sense, science may refer to a highly skilled technique, [[technology]], or practice, from which a good deal of randomness in outcome has been removed.<ref>{{cite web \|url=http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/science \|quote= a department of systematized knowledge as an object of study<the science of theology> '''. . .''' something (as a sport or technique) that may be studied or learned like systematized knowledge <have it down to a science> '''. . .''' a system or method reconciling practical ends with scientific laws <cooking is both a science and an art> \|publisher=Merriam-Webster \|title=Online dictionary \|accessdate=2009-05-22}}</ref>

	In its more restricted contemporary sense, science refers to a system of acquiring knowledge based on [[scientific method]], and to the organized body of knowledge gained through such research.<ref>{{cite web \|url=http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/science \|quote= knowledge or a system of knowledge covering general truths or the operation of general laws especially as obtained and tested through scientific method '''. . .''' such knowledge or such a system of knowledge concerned with the physical world and its phenomena \|publisher=Merriam-Webster \|title=Online dictionary \|accessdate=2009-05-22}}</ref><ref> Karl Popper: ''The Logic of Scientific Discovery'', 2nd English, Routledge Classics, [[New York City]], NY 1959</ref> Science is sometimes called experimental science to differentiate it from applied science, which is the application of scientific research to specific human needs—although the two are commonly interconnected.		In its more restricted contemporary sense, science refers to a system of acquiring knowledge based on [[scientific method]], and to the organized body of knowledge gained through such research.<ref>{{cite web \|url=http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/science \|quote= knowledge or a system of knowledge covering general truths or the operation of general laws especially as obtained and tested through scientific method '''. . .''' such knowledge or such a system of knowledge concerned with the physical world and its phenomena \|publisher=Merriam-Webster \|title=Online dictionary \|accessdate=2009-05-22}}</ref><ref> [[Karl]] Popper: ''The [[Logic]] of Scientific Discovery'', 2nd English, Routledge Classics, [[New York City]], NY 1959</ref> Science is sometimes called experimental science to differentiate it from applied science, which is the application of scientific research to specific human needs—although the two are commonly interconnected.

	Science is a continuing effort to discover and increase human [[knowledge]] and understanding through disciplined research. Using controlled methods, scientists collect observable evidence of natural or social phenomena, record measurable data relating to the observations, and analyze this information to construct theoretical explanations of how things work. The methods of scientific research include the generation of hypotheses about how phenomena work, and experimentation that tests these hypotheses under controlled conditions. Scientists are also expected to publish their information so other scientists can do similar experiments to double-check their conclusions. The results of this process enable better understanding of past events, and better ability to predict future events of the same kind as those that have been tested.		Science is a continuing effort to discover and increase human [[knowledge]] and understanding through disciplined research. Using controlled methods, scientists collect observable evidence of natural or [[social]] phenomena, record measurable data relating to the observations, and analyze this information to construct [[theoretical]] explanations of how things work. The methods of scientific research include the generation of [[hypotheses]] about how phenomena work, and experimentation that tests these hypotheses under controlled conditions. Scientists are also expected to publish their information so other scientists can do similar experiments to double-check their conclusions. The results of this process enable better understanding of past events, and better ability to predict future events of the same kind as those that have been tested.

	The ability of the general population to understand the basic concepts related to science is referred to as scientific literacy.		The ability of the general population to understand the basic concepts related to science is referred to as scientific literacy.
Line 28:		Line 34:
	[[Category:Science\| ]]		[[Category:Science\| ]]
	[[Category:Scientists]]		[[Category:Scientists]]

	~~[[de:Wissenschaft]]~~
	~~[[es:Ciencia]]~~

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹: Text replacement - "{{reflist}}" to "{{reflist|2}}"

2024-02-07T12:37:06Z

Text replacement - "{{reflist}}" to "{{reflist|2}}"

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:37, 7 February 2024
Line 24:		Line 24:

	==References==		==References==
	{{reflist}}		{{reflist\|2}}

	[[Category:Science\| ]]		[[Category:Science\| ]]

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹: 1 revision imported

2024-02-06T22:40:45Z

1 revision imported

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:40, 6 February 2024
(No difference)

en>Crusader at 16:41, 13 December 2023

2023-12-13T16:41:47Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-In [[fascism]], science is any system of knowledge that is concerned with the physical world and its phenomena and that entails unbiased observations and systematic experimentation. In general, a science involves a pursuit of knowledge covering general [[truth]]s or the operations of fundamental [[law]]s. Science can be divided into different branches based on the subject of study.
+'''Science''' is any system of knowledge that is concerned with the physical world and its phenomena and that entails unbiased observations and systematic experimentation. In general, a science involves a pursuit of knowledge covering general truths or the operations of fundamental laws.
-==Background==
+==History==
-'''Science''' is a [[philisophical]] endeavor that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universe. This includes knowlege about [[metaphysics|metaphysical]] things, such as [[God]], or supernatural phenomenon, if they exist.<ref>Contrary to modern dogma, there is nothing in science that says uFOs, bigfoot, God or gods, ghosts, or other unknowns do not exist. Science is supposed to follow the evidence no matter where it leads, even if it takes you to a place that defies your belief system. Science is not atheistic. It is blind and has no prejudices.</ref> Systematic reasoning is tens of thousands of years old. The earliest written records of identifiable predecessors to modern science come from [[Ancient Egypt]] and Mesopotamia (around [[Iran]]) from around 3000 to 1200 BC. Their contributions to mathematics, astronomy, and medicine entered and shaped the Greek natural philosophy of classical antiquity, and passed through all of the greatest civilizations, whereby formal attempts were made to provide explanations of events in the universe. In ancient times this philosophy was referred to as "[[alchemy]]".
+Science (from the [[Latin]] ''scientia'', meaning "knowledge") is, in its broadest sense, any systematic knowledge-base or prescriptive practice that is capable of resulting in a correct prediction, or reliably-predictable type of outcome. In this sense, science may refer to a highly skilled technique, technology, or practice, from which a good deal of randomness in outcome has been removed.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/science |quote= a department of systematized knowledge as an object of study<the science of theology> '''. . .''' something (as a sport or technique) that may be studied or learned like systematized knowledge <have it down to a science> '''. . .''' a system or method reconciling practical ends with scientific laws <cooking is both a science and an art> |publisher=Merriam-Webster |title=Online dictionary |accessdate=2009-05-22}}</ref>
-=Science as a political weapon=
+In its more restricted contemporary sense, science refers to a system of acquiring knowledge based on [[scientific method]], and to the organized body of knowledge gained through such research.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/science |quote= knowledge or a system of knowledge covering general truths or the operation of general laws especially as obtained and tested through scientific method '''. . .''' such knowledge or such a system of knowledge concerned with the physical world and its phenomena |publisher=Merriam-Webster |title=Online dictionary |accessdate=2009-05-22}}</ref><ref> Karl Popper: ''The Logic of Scientific Discovery'', 2nd English, Routledge Classics, [[New York City]], NY 1959</ref> Science is sometimes called experimental science to differentiate it from applied science, which is the application of scientific research to specific human needs—although the two are commonly interconnected.
 ==References==

Bacchus at 18:54, 9 May 2023

2023-05-09T18:54:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:54, 9 May 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
			In [[fascism]], science is any system of knowledge that is concerned with the physical world and its phenomena and that entails unbiased observations and systematic experimentation. In general, a science involves a pursuit of knowledge covering general [[truth]]s or the operations of fundamental [[law]]s. Science can be divided into different branches based on the subject of study.

			==Background==
	'''Science''' is a [[philisophical]] endeavor that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universe. This includes knowlege about [[metaphysics\|metaphysical]] things, such as [[God]], or supernatural phenomenon, if they exist.<ref>Contrary to modern dogma, there is nothing in science that says uFOs, bigfoot, God or gods, ghosts, or other unknowns do not exist. Science is supposed to follow the evidence no matter where it leads, even if it takes you to a place that defies your belief system. Science is not atheistic. It is blind and has no prejudices.</ref> Systematic reasoning is tens of thousands of years old. The earliest written records of identifiable predecessors to modern science come from [[Ancient Egypt]] and Mesopotamia (around [[Iran]]) from around 3000 to 1200 BC. Their contributions to mathematics, astronomy, and medicine entered and shaped the Greek natural philosophy of classical antiquity, and passed through all of the greatest civilizations, whereby formal attempts were made to provide explanations of events in the universe. In ancient times this philosophy was referred to as "[[alchemy]]".		'''Science''' is a [[philisophical]] endeavor that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universe. This includes knowlege about [[metaphysics\|metaphysical]] things, such as [[God]], or supernatural phenomenon, if they exist.<ref>Contrary to modern dogma, there is nothing in science that says uFOs, bigfoot, God or gods, ghosts, or other unknowns do not exist. Science is supposed to follow the evidence no matter where it leads, even if it takes you to a place that defies your belief system. Science is not atheistic. It is blind and has no prejudices.</ref> Systematic reasoning is tens of thousands of years old. The earliest written records of identifiable predecessors to modern science come from [[Ancient Egypt]] and Mesopotamia (around [[Iran]]) from around 3000 to 1200 BC. Their contributions to mathematics, astronomy, and medicine entered and shaped the Greek natural philosophy of classical antiquity, and passed through all of the greatest civilizations, whereby formal attempts were made to provide explanations of events in the universe. In ancient times this philosophy was referred to as "[[alchemy]]".

Rightof Genghiskhan at 06:19, 27 February 2023

2023-02-27T06:19:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:19, 26 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Science''' is a [[philisophical]] endeavor that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universe. This includes knowlege about [[metaphysics\|metaphysical]] things, such as [[God]], or supernatural phenomenon, if they exist.<ref>Contrary to modern dogma, there is nothing in science that says uFOs, bigfoot, God or gods, ghosts, or other unknowns do not exist. Science is supposed to follow the evidence no matter where it leads, even if it takes you to a place that defies your ~~beief~~ system. Science is not atheistic. It is blind and has no prejudices.</ref> Systematic reasoning is tens of thousands of years old. The earliest written records of identifiable predecessors to modern science come from [[Ancient Egypt]] and Mesopotamia (around [[Iran]]) from around 3000 to 1200 BC. Their contributions to mathematics, astronomy, and medicine entered and shaped the Greek natural philosophy of classical antiquity, and passed through all of the greatest civilizations, whereby formal attempts were made to provide explanations of events in the universe. In ancient times this philosophy was referred to as "[[alchemy]]".		'''Science''' is a [[philisophical]] endeavor that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universe. This includes knowlege about [[metaphysics\|metaphysical]] things, such as [[God]], or supernatural phenomenon, if they exist.<ref>Contrary to modern dogma, there is nothing in science that says uFOs, bigfoot, God or gods, ghosts, or other unknowns do not exist. Science is supposed to follow the evidence no matter where it leads, even if it takes you to a place that defies your belief system. Science is not atheistic. It is blind and has no prejudices.</ref> Systematic reasoning is tens of thousands of years old. The earliest written records of identifiable predecessors to modern science come from [[Ancient Egypt]] and Mesopotamia (around [[Iran]]) from around 3000 to 1200 BC. Their contributions to mathematics, astronomy, and medicine entered and shaped the Greek natural philosophy of classical antiquity, and passed through all of the greatest civilizations, whereby formal attempts were made to provide explanations of events in the universe. In ancient times this philosophy was referred to as "[[alchemy]]".

	=Science as a political weapon=		=Science as a political weapon=

Bacchus: Text replacement - "BCE" to "BC"

2023-02-24T07:32:10Z

Text replacement - "BCE" to "BC"

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:32, 23 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Science''' is a [[philisophical]] endeavor that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universe. This includes knowlege about [[metaphysics\|metaphysical]] things, such as [[God]], or supernatural phenomenon, if they exist.<ref>Contrary to modern dogma, there is nothing in science that says uFOs, bigfoot, God or gods, ghosts, or other unknowns do not exist. Science is supposed to follow the evidence no matter where it leads, even if it takes you to a place that defies your beief system. Science is not atheistic. It is blind and has no prejudices.</ref> Systematic reasoning is tens of thousands of years old. The earliest written records of identifiable predecessors to modern science come from [[Ancient Egypt]] and Mesopotamia (around [[Iran]]) from around 3000 to 1200 ~~BCE~~. Their contributions to mathematics, astronomy, and medicine entered and shaped the Greek natural philosophy of classical antiquity, and passed through all of the greatest civilizations, whereby formal attempts were made to provide explanations of events in the universe. In ancient times this philosophy was referred to as "[[alchemy]]".		'''Science''' is a [[philisophical]] endeavor that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universe. This includes knowlege about [[metaphysics\|metaphysical]] things, such as [[God]], or supernatural phenomenon, if they exist.<ref>Contrary to modern dogma, there is nothing in science that says uFOs, bigfoot, God or gods, ghosts, or other unknowns do not exist. Science is supposed to follow the evidence no matter where it leads, even if it takes you to a place that defies your beief system. Science is not atheistic. It is blind and has no prejudices.</ref> Systematic reasoning is tens of thousands of years old. The earliest written records of identifiable predecessors to modern science come from [[Ancient Egypt]] and Mesopotamia (around [[Iran]]) from around 3000 to 1200 BC. Their contributions to mathematics, astronomy, and medicine entered and shaped the Greek natural philosophy of classical antiquity, and passed through all of the greatest civilizations, whereby formal attempts were made to provide explanations of events in the universe. In ancient times this philosophy was referred to as "[[alchemy]]".

	=Science as a political weapon=		=Science as a political weapon=

Bacchus: /* Science as a political weapon */

2023-02-15T22:49:50Z

Science as a political weapon

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:49, 15 February 2023
Line 2:		Line 2:

	=Science as a political weapon=		=Science as a political weapon=
	{{Rquote\|left\|“We should always evaluate the risks and benefits of efforts to control the virus, in this moment the public health risks of not protesting to demand an end to systemic racism greatly exceed the harms of the virus.”\|Jennifer Nuzzo\|epidemiologist<br>Johns Hopkins Clinic}}[[jews]] and [[Marxists]] frequently use science as a political weapon. Over the course of the fake pandemic (and also, in debates over climate disaster, alar, radon, ozone, etc.). Marxists have lectured us that we must ''listen to science'' and heed the scientists. Scientists have important things to say to policymakers and citizens alike. But the same champions of science suddenly changed their tune about liberal "protests". Telling people that they can’t see their dying parents, attend a funeral or make a living because science says it’s too risky but that protesting ~~systemic racism and police brutality~~ is OK is ~~a great way to convince millions of people~~ that “listen to science” is a weaponized political term, not a universal apolitical standard.		{{Rquote\|left\|“We should always evaluate the risks and benefits of efforts to control the virus, in this moment the public health risks of not protesting to demand an end to systemic racism greatly exceed the harms of the virus.”\|Jennifer Nuzzo\|epidemiologist<br>Johns Hopkins Clinic}}[[jews]] and [[Marxists]] frequently use science as a political weapon. Over the course of the fake pandemic (and also, in debates over climate disaster, alar, radon, ozone, etc.). Marxists have lectured us that we must ''listen to science'' and heed the scientists. Scientists have important things to say to policymakers and citizens alike. But the same champions of science suddenly changed their tune about liberal "protests". Telling people that they can’t see their dying parents, attend a funeral or make a living because science says "''it’s too risky''", but that protesting politically is OK, is the best evidence that “listen to science” is a weaponized political term, '''not''' a universal '''apolitical''' standard.


	==References==		==References==

Bacchus: /* Science as a political weapon */

2023-02-15T22:46:19Z

Science as a political weapon

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:46, 15 February 2023
Line 2:		Line 2:

	=Science as a political weapon=		=Science as a political weapon=
	{{Rquote\|left\|“We should always evaluate the risks and benefits of efforts to control the virus,~~” , declared on Twitter. “In~~ this moment the public health risks of not protesting to demand an end to systemic racism greatly exceed the harms of the virus.”\|Jennifer Nuzzo\|epidemiologist<br>Johns Hopkins Clinic}}[[jews]] and [[Marxists]] frequently use science as a political weapon. Over the course of the fake pandemic (and also, in debates over climate disaster, alar, radon, ozone, etc.). Marxists have lectured us that we must ''listen to science'' and heed the scientists. Scientists have important things to say to policymakers and citizens alike. But the same champions of science suddenly changed their tune about liberal "protests". Telling people that they can’t see their dying parents, attend a funeral or make a living because science says it’s too risky but that protesting systemic racism and police brutality is OK is a great way to convince millions of people that “listen to science” is a weaponized political term, not a universal apolitical standard.		{{Rquote\|left\|“We should always evaluate the risks and benefits of efforts to control the virus, in this moment the public health risks of not protesting to demand an end to systemic racism greatly exceed the harms of the virus.”\|Jennifer Nuzzo\|epidemiologist<br>Johns Hopkins Clinic}}[[jews]] and [[Marxists]] frequently use science as a political weapon. Over the course of the fake pandemic (and also, in debates over climate disaster, alar, radon, ozone, etc.). Marxists have lectured us that we must ''listen to science'' and heed the scientists. Scientists have important things to say to policymakers and citizens alike. But the same champions of science suddenly changed their tune about liberal "protests". Telling people that they can’t see their dying parents, attend a funeral or make a living because science says it’s too risky but that protesting systemic racism and police brutality is OK is a great way to convince millions of people that “listen to science” is a weaponized political term, not a universal apolitical standard.


	==References==		==References==

Bacchus: /* Science as a political weapon */

2023-02-15T22:45:28Z

Science as a political weapon

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:45, 15 February 2023
Line 2:		Line 2:

	=Science as a political weapon=		=Science as a political weapon=
	{{Rquote\|left\|“We should always evaluate the risks and benefits of efforts to control the virus,” , declared on Twitter. “In this moment the public health risks of not protesting to demand an end to systemic racism greatly exceed the harms of the virus.”\|Jennifer Nuzzo\|epidemiologist at Johns Hopkins Clinic}}[[jews]] and [[Marxists]] frequently use science as a political weapon. Over the course of the fake pandemic (and also, in debates over climate disaster, alar, radon, ozone, etc.). Marxists have lectured us that we must ''listen to science'' and heed the scientists. Scientists have important things to say to policymakers and citizens alike. But the same champions of science suddenly changed their tune about liberal "protests". Telling people that they can’t see their dying parents, attend a funeral or make a living because science says it’s too risky but that protesting systemic racism and police brutality is OK is a great way to convince millions of people that “listen to science” is a weaponized political term, not a universal apolitical standard.		{{Rquote\|left\|“We should always evaluate the risks and benefits of efforts to control the virus,” , declared on Twitter. “In this moment the public health risks of not protesting to demand an end to systemic racism greatly exceed the harms of the virus.”\|Jennifer Nuzzo\|epidemiologist<br>Johns Hopkins Clinic}}[[jews]] and [[Marxists]] frequently use science as a political weapon. Over the course of the fake pandemic (and also, in debates over climate disaster, alar, radon, ozone, etc.). Marxists have lectured us that we must ''listen to science'' and heed the scientists. Scientists have important things to say to policymakers and citizens alike. But the same champions of science suddenly changed their tune about liberal "protests". Telling people that they can’t see their dying parents, attend a funeral or make a living because science says it’s too risky but that protesting systemic racism and police brutality is OK is a great way to convince millions of people that “listen to science” is a weaponized political term, not a universal apolitical standard.


	==References==		==References==