Scientism - Revision history

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹: Text replacement - "\[\[Category(.) of (.)\]\]" to ""

2024-02-22T01:56:03Z

Text replacement - "\[\[Category(.*) of (.*)\]\]" to ""

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:56, 21 February 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Scientism''' is the opinion that Science [[Category:Science]] and the [[scientific method]] are the best or only way to render truth about the [[world]] and reality.<ref>{{Cite web \|title=Glossary Definition: Scientism \|url=https://www.pbs.org/faithandreason/gengloss/sciism-body.html \|date=1999 \|access-date=2022-07-30 \|website=www.pbs.org \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20001011010123/https://www.pbs.org/faithandreason/gengloss/sciism-body.html \|archive-date=2000-10-11 \|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal \|last1=Hietanen \|first1=Johan \|last2=Turunen \|first2=Petri \|last3=Hirvonen \|first3=Ilmari \|last4=Karisto \|first4=Janne \|last5=Pättiniemi \|first5=Ilkka \|last6=Saarinen \|first6=Henrik \|date=July 2020 \|title=How not to criticise scientism \|journal=Metaphilosophy \|volume=51 \|issue=4 \|pages=522–547 \|doi=10.1111/meta.12443 \|doi-access=free \|quote=[Scientism can be divided] into four categories in terms of how strong (Science [[Category:Science]] is the only source of knowledge) or weak (Science ~~[[Category:Science]] is the best source of knowledge) and how narrow (only natural Science [[Category:Science]]~~s) or broad (all Science [[Category:Science]]s or at least not only the natural Science [[Category:Science]]s) they are.}}</ref>		'''Scientism''' is the opinion that Science is the only source of knowledge) or weak (Science s) or broad (all Science [[Category:Science]]s or at least not only the natural Science [[Category:Science]]s) they are.}}</ref>

	While the term was defined originally to mean "methods and attitudes typical of or attributed to natural scientists", some scholars (and subsequently many others) also adopted it as a pejorative term with the meaning "an exaggerated trust in the efficacy of the methods of natural Science ~~[[Category:Science]] applied to all areas of investigation (as in philosophy, the social Science [[Category:Science]]~~s, and the humanities)".<ref>{{cite web \|url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/scientism/ \|title=Scientism \|publisher=Merriam-Webster \|website=Meriam-Webster.com Dictionary \|access-date=April 6, 2021}}</ref>		While the term was defined originally to mean "methods and attitudes typical of or attributed to natural scientists", some scholars (and subsequently many others) also adopted it as a pejorative term with the meaning "an exaggerated trust in the efficacy of the methods of natural Science s, and the humanities)".<ref>{{cite web \|url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/scientism/ \|title=Scientism \|publisher=Merriam-Webster \|website=Meriam-Webster.com Dictionary \|access-date=April 6, 2021}}</ref>

Bacchus: Text replacement - "science" to "Science Category:Science"

2023-02-14T02:12:50Z

Text replacement - "science" to "Science Category:Science"

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:12, 13 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Scientism''' is the opinion that ~~science~~ and the [[scientific method]] are the best or only way to render truth about the [[world]] and reality.<ref>{{Cite web \|title=Glossary Definition: Scientism \|url=https://www.pbs.org/faithandreason/gengloss/sciism-body.html \|date=1999 \|access-date=2022-07-30 \|website=www.pbs.org \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20001011010123/https://www.pbs.org/faithandreason/gengloss/sciism-body.html \|archive-date=2000-10-11 \|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal \|last1=Hietanen \|first1=Johan \|last2=Turunen \|first2=Petri \|last3=Hirvonen \|first3=Ilmari \|last4=Karisto \|first4=Janne \|last5=Pättiniemi \|first5=Ilkka \|last6=Saarinen \|first6=Henrik \|date=July 2020 \|title=How not to criticise scientism \|journal=Metaphilosophy \|volume=51 \|issue=4 \|pages=522–547 \|doi=10.1111/meta.12443 \|doi-access=free \|quote=[Scientism can be divided] into four categories in terms of how strong (~~science~~ is the only source of knowledge) or weak (~~science~~ is the best source of knowledge) and how narrow (only natural ~~sciences~~) or broad (all ~~sciences~~ or at least not only the natural ~~sciences~~) they are.}}</ref>		'''Scientism''' is the opinion that Science [[Category:Science]] and the [[scientific method]] are the best or only way to render truth about the [[world]] and reality.<ref>{{Cite web \|title=Glossary Definition: Scientism \|url=https://www.pbs.org/faithandreason/gengloss/sciism-body.html \|date=1999 \|access-date=2022-07-30 \|website=www.pbs.org \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20001011010123/https://www.pbs.org/faithandreason/gengloss/sciism-body.html \|archive-date=2000-10-11 \|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal \|last1=Hietanen \|first1=Johan \|last2=Turunen \|first2=Petri \|last3=Hirvonen \|first3=Ilmari \|last4=Karisto \|first4=Janne \|last5=Pättiniemi \|first5=Ilkka \|last6=Saarinen \|first6=Henrik \|date=July 2020 \|title=How not to criticise scientism \|journal=Metaphilosophy \|volume=51 \|issue=4 \|pages=522–547 \|doi=10.1111/meta.12443 \|doi-access=free \|quote=[Scientism can be divided] into four categories in terms of how strong (Science [[Category:Science]] is the only source of knowledge) or weak (Science [[Category:Science]] is the best source of knowledge) and how narrow (only natural Science [[Category:Science]]s) or broad (all Science [[Category:Science]]s or at least not only the natural Science [[Category:Science]]s) they are.}}</ref>

	While the term was defined originally to mean "methods and attitudes typical of or attributed to natural scientists", some scholars (and subsequently many others) also adopted it as a pejorative term with the meaning "an exaggerated trust in the efficacy of the methods of natural ~~science~~ applied to all areas of investigation (as in philosophy, the social ~~sciences~~, and the humanities)".<ref>{{cite web \|url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/scientism/ \|title=Scientism \|publisher=Merriam-Webster \|website=Meriam-Webster.com Dictionary \|access-date=April 6, 2021}}</ref>		While the term was defined originally to mean "methods and attitudes typical of or attributed to natural scientists", some scholars (and subsequently many others) also adopted it as a pejorative term with the meaning "an exaggerated trust in the efficacy of the methods of natural Science [[Category:Science]] applied to all areas of investigation (as in philosophy, the social Science [[Category:Science]]s, and the humanities)".<ref>{{cite web \|url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/scientism/ \|title=Scientism \|publisher=Merriam-Webster \|website=Meriam-Webster.com Dictionary \|access-date=April 6, 2021}}</ref>

Bacchus: Created page with "'''Scientism''' is the opinion that science and the scientific method are the best or only way to render truth about the world and reality.{{Cite web |title=Glossary Definition: Scientism |url=https://www.pbs.org/faithandreason/gengloss/sciism-body.html |date=1999 |access-date=2022-07-30 |website=www.pbs.org |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20001011010123/https://www.pbs.org/faithandreason/gengloss/sciism-body.html |archive-date=2000-10-11 |url-statu..."

2023-01-16T02:50:54Z

Created page with "'''Scientism''' is the opinion that science and the scientific method are the best or only way to render truth about the world and reality.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Glossary Definition: Scientism |url=https://www.pbs.org/faithandreason/gengloss/sciism-body.html |date=1999 |access-date=2022-07-30 |website=www.pbs.org |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20001011010123/https://www.pbs.org/faithandreason/gengloss/sciism-body.html |archive-date=2000-10-11 |url-statu..."

New page

'''Scientism''' is the opinion that science and the [[scientific method]] are the best or only way to render truth about the [[world]] and reality.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Glossary Definition: Scientism |url=https://www.pbs.org/faithandreason/gengloss/sciism-body.html |date=1999 |access-date=2022-07-30 |website=www.pbs.org |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20001011010123/https://www.pbs.org/faithandreason/gengloss/sciism-body.html |archive-date=2000-10-11 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Hietanen |first1=Johan |last2=Turunen |first2=Petri |last3=Hirvonen |first3=Ilmari |last4=Karisto |first4=Janne |last5=Pättiniemi |first5=Ilkka |last6=Saarinen |first6=Henrik |date=July 2020 |title=How not to criticise scientism |journal=Metaphilosophy |volume=51 |issue=4 |pages=522–547 |doi=10.1111/meta.12443 |doi-access=free |quote=[Scientism can be divided] into four categories in terms of how strong (science is the only source of knowledge) or weak (science is the best source of knowledge) and how narrow (only natural sciences) or broad (all sciences or at least not only the natural sciences) they are.}}</ref>

While the term was defined originally to mean "methods and attitudes typical of or attributed to natural scientists", some scholars (and subsequently many others) also adopted it as a pejorative term with the meaning "an exaggerated trust in the efficacy of the methods of natural science applied to all areas of investigation (as in philosophy, the social sciences, and the humanities)".<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/scientism/ |title=Scientism |publisher=Merriam-Webster |website=Meriam-Webster.com Dictionary |access-date=April 6, 2021}}</ref>

==References==
{{Reflist|2}}

[[Category:Definitions]]
[[Category:Philosophy]]

Scientism - Revision history

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹: Text replacement - "\[\[Category(.*) of (.*)\]\]" to ""

Bacchus: Text replacement - "science" to "Science Category:Science"

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹: Text replacement - "\[\[Category(.) of (.)\]\]" to ""