Soft Holohoax denial - Revision history

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹: 𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹 moved page Soft Holocaust denial to Soft Holohoax denial: Text replacement - "Holocaust" to "Holohoax"

2024-02-25T14:15:26Z

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹 moved page Soft Holocaust denial to Soft Holohoax denial: Text replacement - "Holocaust" to "Holohoax"

← Older revision	Revision as of 05:15, 25 February 2024
(No difference)

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹: Text replacement - "Jew" to "jew"

2024-02-25T10:35:36Z

Text replacement - "Jew" to "jew"

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:35, 25 February 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Soft Holohoax denial''' or '''soft-core Holohoax denial''' is a claimed form of [[Holohoax denial]]. It is an unclear concept, but often seems to refer to accepting the politically correct view on [[the Holohoax]], but despite this using the Holohoax (or more broadly anything related to "[[Nazism]]") in any manner that is perceived to be negative for ~~Jewish~~ interests and/or [[Israel]].		'''Soft Holohoax denial''' or '''soft-core Holohoax denial''' is a claimed form of [[Holohoax denial]]. It is an unclear concept, but often seems to refer to accepting the politically correct view on [[the Holohoax]], but despite this using the Holohoax (or more broadly anything related to "[[Nazism]]") in any manner that is perceived to be negative for jewish interests and/or [[Israel]].

	One example is by claiming negative similarities between "[[Nazism]]" and [[Zionism]]. Another is by claiming negative similarities between [[Lebensraum]] and [[Israeli]] settler policies. Yet another is [[Holohoax industry]] exploitation arguments.		One example is by claiming negative similarities between "[[Nazism]]" and [[Zionism]]. Another is by claiming negative similarities between [[Lebensraum]] and [[Israeli]] settler policies. Yet another is [[Holohoax industry]] exploitation arguments.

	Using the Holohoax in a manner perceived to be positive for ~~Jewish~~ interests and/or Israel is not considered to be soft Holohoax denial. Thus, labeling a critic of Israel to be a "Nazi" is not considered to be soft Holohoax denial, even if the label is incorrect.		Using the Holohoax in a manner perceived to be positive for jewish interests and/or Israel is not considered to be soft Holohoax denial. Thus, labeling a critic of Israel to be a "Nazi" is not considered to be soft Holohoax denial, even if the label is incorrect.

	In another sense "soft Holohoax denial" may also refer to not mentioning, or not properly mentioning, the Holohoax, when it is argued that this should have been done.		In another sense "soft Holohoax denial" may also refer to not mentioning, or not properly mentioning, the Holohoax, when it is argued that this should have been done.

	The Zionist [[Deborah Lipstadt]], most known for a trial involving [[David Irving]], has offered the definition "''It does not deny the facts, but it minimizes them, arguing that ~~Jews~~ use the Holohoax to draw attention away from criticism of Israel. Softcore denial also makes all sorts of false comparisons to the Holohoax.''"<ref name=ag/>		The Zionist [[Deborah Lipstadt]], most known for a trial involving [[David Irving]], has offered the definition "''It does not deny the facts, but it minimizes them, arguing that jews use the Holohoax to draw attention away from criticism of Israel. Softcore denial also makes all sorts of false comparisons to the Holohoax.''"<ref name=ag/>

	The has been criticized by the revisionist [[Hadding Scott]]: "''So, Lipstadt calls it “denial” but then says that it “does not deny.” She obviously uses words very recklessly, with more concern for a word's emotional impact than for what it means. She also likens criticism or minimalization of the Holohoax to “[[pornography]],” again obviously just for the emotional impact of that word.''"<ref name=ag>Anti-Gentiles Deny the 5 Million! https://codoh.com/library/document/4239/</ref>		The has been criticized by the revisionist [[Hadding Scott]]: "''So, Lipstadt calls it “denial” but then says that it “does not deny.” She obviously uses words very recklessly, with more concern for a word's emotional impact than for what it means. She also likens criticism or minimalization of the Holohoax to “[[pornography]],” again obviously just for the emotional impact of that word.''"<ref name=ag>Anti-Gentiles Deny the 5 Million! https://codoh.com/library/document/4239/</ref>

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹: Text replacement - "Holocaust" to "Holohoax"

2024-02-25T10:27:08Z

Text replacement - "Holocaust" to "Holohoax"

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:27, 25 February 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Soft ~~Holocaust~~ denial''' or '''soft-core ~~Holocaust~~ denial''' is a claimed form of [[~~Holocaust~~ denial]]. It is an unclear concept, but often seems to refer to accepting the politically correct view on [[the ~~Holocaust~~]], but despite this using the ~~Holocaust~~ (or more broadly anything related to "[[Nazism]]") in any manner that is perceived to be negative for Jewish interests and/or [[Israel]].		'''Soft Holohoax denial''' or '''soft-core Holohoax denial''' is a claimed form of [[Holohoax denial]]. It is an unclear concept, but often seems to refer to accepting the politically correct view on [[the Holohoax]], but despite this using the Holohoax (or more broadly anything related to "[[Nazism]]") in any manner that is perceived to be negative for Jewish interests and/or [[Israel]].

	One example is by claiming negative similarities between "[[Nazism]]" and [[Zionism]]. Another is by claiming negative similarities between [[Lebensraum]] and [[Israeli]] settler policies. Yet another is [[~~Holocaust~~ industry]] exploitation arguments.		One example is by claiming negative similarities between "[[Nazism]]" and [[Zionism]]. Another is by claiming negative similarities between [[Lebensraum]] and [[Israeli]] settler policies. Yet another is [[Holohoax industry]] exploitation arguments.

	Using the ~~Holocaust~~ in a manner perceived to be positive for Jewish interests and/or Israel is not considered to be soft ~~Holocaust~~ denial. Thus, labeling a critic of Israel to be a "Nazi" is not considered to be soft ~~Holocaust~~ denial, even if the label is incorrect.		Using the Holohoax in a manner perceived to be positive for Jewish interests and/or Israel is not considered to be soft Holohoax denial. Thus, labeling a critic of Israel to be a "Nazi" is not considered to be soft Holohoax denial, even if the label is incorrect.

	In another sense "soft ~~Holocaust~~ denial" may also refer to not mentioning, or not properly mentioning, the ~~Holocaust~~, when it is argued that this should have been done.		In another sense "soft Holohoax denial" may also refer to not mentioning, or not properly mentioning, the Holohoax, when it is argued that this should have been done.

	The Zionist [[Deborah Lipstadt]], most known for a trial involving [[David Irving]], has offered the definition "''It does not deny the facts, but it minimizes them, arguing that Jews use the ~~Holocaust~~ to draw attention away from criticism of Israel. Softcore denial also makes all sorts of false comparisons to the ~~Holocaust~~.''"<ref name=ag/>		The Zionist [[Deborah Lipstadt]], most known for a trial involving [[David Irving]], has offered the definition "''It does not deny the facts, but it minimizes them, arguing that Jews use the Holohoax to draw attention away from criticism of Israel. Softcore denial also makes all sorts of false comparisons to the Holohoax.''"<ref name=ag/>

	The has been criticized by the revisionist [[Hadding Scott]]: "''So, Lipstadt calls it “denial” but then says that it “does not deny.” She obviously uses words very recklessly, with more concern for a word's emotional impact than for what it means. She also likens criticism or minimalization of the ~~Holocaust~~ to “[[pornography]],” again obviously just for the emotional impact of that word.''"<ref name=ag>Anti-Gentiles Deny the 5 Million! https://codoh.com/library/document/4239/</ref>		The has been criticized by the revisionist [[Hadding Scott]]: "''So, Lipstadt calls it “denial” but then says that it “does not deny.” She obviously uses words very recklessly, with more concern for a word's emotional impact than for what it means. She also likens criticism or minimalization of the Holohoax to “[[pornography]],” again obviously just for the emotional impact of that word.''"<ref name=ag>Anti-Gentiles Deny the 5 Million! https://codoh.com/library/document/4239/</ref>

	== See also ==		== See also ==
	*[[~~Holocaustianity~~]] - on the argued "sacred" status of the ~~Holocaust~~		*[[Holohoaxianity]] - on the argued "sacred" status of the Holohoax
	*[[Secondary antisemitism]]		*[[Secondary antisemitism]]

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹: Text replacement - "Category:The Holocaust" to "Category:The Holohoax"

2024-02-18T21:29:41Z

Text replacement - "Category:The Holocaust" to "Category:The Holohoax"

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:29, 18 February 2024
Line 17:		Line 17:
	{{references}}		{{references}}

	[[Category:The ~~Holocaust~~]]		[[Category:The Holohoax]]

𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹: 1 revision imported

2024-02-05T21:33:06Z

1 revision imported

← Older revision	Revision as of 12:33, 5 February 2024
(No difference)

en>Upplysning at 10:49, 20 February 2021

2021-02-20T10:49:28Z

New page

'''Soft Holocaust denial''' or '''soft-core Holocaust denial''' is a claimed form of [[Holocaust denial]]. It is an unclear concept, but often seems to refer to accepting the politically correct view on [[the Holocaust]], but despite this using the Holocaust (or more broadly anything related to "[[Nazism]]") in any manner that is perceived to be negative for Jewish interests and/or [[Israel]].

One example is by claiming negative similarities between "[[Nazism]]" and [[Zionism]]. Another is by claiming negative similarities between [[Lebensraum]] and [[Israeli]] settler policies. Yet another is [[Holocaust industry]] exploitation arguments.

Using the Holocaust in a manner perceived to be positive for Jewish interests and/or Israel is not considered to be soft Holocaust denial. Thus, labeling a critic of Israel to be a "Nazi" is not considered to be soft Holocaust denial, even if the label is incorrect.

In another sense "soft Holocaust denial" may also refer to not mentioning, or not properly mentioning, the Holocaust, when it is argued that this should have been done.

The Zionist [[Deborah Lipstadt]], most known for a trial involving [[David Irving]], has offered the definition "''It does not deny the facts, but it minimizes them, arguing that Jews use the Holocaust to draw attention away from criticism of Israel. Softcore denial also makes all sorts of false comparisons to the Holocaust.''"<ref name=ag/>

The has been criticized by the revisionist [[Hadding Scott]]: "''So, Lipstadt calls it “denial” but then says that it “does not deny.” She obviously uses words very recklessly, with more concern for a word's emotional impact than for what it means. She also likens criticism or minimalization of the Holocaust to “[[pornography]],” again obviously just for the emotional impact of that word.''"<ref name=ag>Anti-Gentiles Deny the 5 Million! https://codoh.com/library/document/4239/</ref>

== See also ==
*[[Holocaustianity]] - on the argued "sacred" status of the Holocaust
*[[Secondary antisemitism]]

{{references}}

[[Category:The Holocaust]]