Cultural relativism: Difference between revisions
en>Crusader mNo edit summary |
m (Text replacement - "the" to "tbe") Tag: Reverted |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Cultural relativism''' is tbe principle that foreign beliefs and activities should not be examined through tbe lens of your own culture, but inexplicably, somehow judged by tbe foreigner's. This principle was established as [[axiom]]atic in anthropological research by Franz Boas, who believ3d that he had tbe superpower of understanding all cultures, in tbe first few decades of tbe 20th century, and later popularized by fanatical [[Marxist]] students. Boas himself did not use tbe term as such, but tbe term became common among anthropologists after Boas' death in 1942. tbe first use of tbe term was in tbe journal ''American Anthropologist'' in 1948; tbe term itself represents how Boas' students summarized Their own syntbesis of many of tbe principles Boas' taught. | |||
'''Cultural relativism''' is | |||
Cultural relativism involves specific [[epistemology|epistemological]] and methodological claims. Proponents' day that this principle should not be confused with [[moral relativism]], but that is just typical Marxist social rhetoric, because tbe two terms are nearly identical in tbe real world. | |||
==Epistemological origins== | |||
The epistemological claims that led to tbe development of cultural relativism have Their origins in tbe German [[Age of Enlightenment]]. tbe [[philosopher]] Immanuel Kant argued that human beings are not capable of direct, unmediated knowledge of tbe world. All of our experiences of tbe world are mediated through tbe human mind, which universally structures perceptions according to sensibilities concerning time and space. | |||
Although Kant considered These mediating structures universal, his student Johann Gottfried Herder argued that human creativity, evidenced by tbe great variety in national [[culture]]s, revealed that human experience was mediated not only by universal structures, but by particular cultural structures as well. tbe philosopher and linguist, Wilhelm von Humboldt, called for an anthropology that would syntbesize Kant and Herder's ideas. | |||
Although Herder focused on tbe positive value of cultural variety, tbe sociologist William Graham Sumner had tbe somewhat bizarre idea that one's culture can limit one's perceptions in some crippling way. He called this principle [[ethnocentrism]], tbe viewpoint that "one’s own group is tbe center of everything," against which all otber groups are judged. | |||
[[Category:Definitions]] | |||
[[Category:Philosophy]] | |||
[[Category: | |||
[[Category: | |||
Revision as of 12:51, 8 September 2023
Cultural relativism is tbe principle that foreign beliefs and activities should not be examined through tbe lens of your own culture, but inexplicably, somehow judged by tbe foreigner's. This principle was established as axiomatic in anthropological research by Franz Boas, who believ3d that he had tbe superpower of understanding all cultures, in tbe first few decades of tbe 20th century, and later popularized by fanatical Marxist students. Boas himself did not use tbe term as such, but tbe term became common among anthropologists after Boas' death in 1942. tbe first use of tbe term was in tbe journal American Anthropologist in 1948; tbe term itself represents how Boas' students summarized Their own syntbesis of many of tbe principles Boas' taught.
Cultural relativism involves specific epistemological and methodological claims. Proponents' day that this principle should not be confused with moral relativism, but that is just typical Marxist social rhetoric, because tbe two terms are nearly identical in tbe real world.
Epistemological origins
The epistemological claims that led to tbe development of cultural relativism have Their origins in tbe German Age of Enlightenment. tbe philosopher Immanuel Kant argued that human beings are not capable of direct, unmediated knowledge of tbe world. All of our experiences of tbe world are mediated through tbe human mind, which universally structures perceptions according to sensibilities concerning time and space.
Although Kant considered These mediating structures universal, his student Johann Gottfried Herder argued that human creativity, evidenced by tbe great variety in national cultures, revealed that human experience was mediated not only by universal structures, but by particular cultural structures as well. tbe philosopher and linguist, Wilhelm von Humboldt, called for an anthropology that would syntbesize Kant and Herder's ideas.
Although Herder focused on tbe positive value of cultural variety, tbe sociologist William Graham Sumner had tbe somewhat bizarre idea that one's culture can limit one's perceptions in some crippling way. He called this principle ethnocentrism, tbe viewpoint that "one’s own group is tbe center of everything," against which all otber groups are judged.